Forecasting Production Performance Using MLP and LSTM: Analysis of Design Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22213/2410-9304-2025-4-79-85Keywords:
multilayer perceptron, recurrent networks, information system, production, design, system analysis, statisticsAbstract
This article examines the problem of production indicator forecasting using deep learning methods based on fully connected and recurrent neural networks. It focuses on the practical implementation of regression models by means of a multilayer perceptron (MLP) and a recurrent neural network with long short-term memory (LSTM), as well as on the analysis of their design approaches taking into account the characteristics of the source data. The work covers the full cycle of model construction: data collection and preprocessing, feature normalization, generating training and test samples, constructing neural network architectures, hyperparametertuning, training process, forecast qualityassessment, and resultvisualization. As an applied example, the problem of production volume forecasting based on real historical data and characterizing the performance of production facilities over a multi-year period is considered. For MLP models, the data is treated as independent observations, while for LSTM, fixed-length time sequences are generated, allowing for the dynamics and long-termindicator dependencies to be taken into account. A comparative analysis of architectural solutions, computational complexity, resource requirements, and forecasting accuracy is conducted. It is shown that LSTM demonstrates higher accuracy when working with time series due to its ability to account for temporal context, but requires significantly more computational effort. At the same time, MLP is characterized by its ease of implementation and faster training speed, making it suitable for tasks with poorly defined temporal data structure. The results of the study can be used in the design of intelligent information and analytical systems for the manufacturing sector and serve as a practical guide for choosing a neural network architecture with respect to the nature of the data and accuracy and resource requirements.References
Zhu M., Zhang G., Zhang L., Han W., Shi Zh., Lv X. Object segmentation by spraying robot based on multi-layer perceptron // Energies. 2023. Vol. 16, no. 1. P. 232.
Xu F. Research on traffic flow prediction method based on LSTM model and PSO-LSTM model // Applied and Computational Engineering. 2024. Vol. 101, no. 1. P. 154-163.
Oliveira D.D., Rampinelli M., Tozatto G.Z., Andreão R.V., Müller S.M.T.Forecasting vehicular traffic flow using MLP and LSTM // Neural Computing & Applications. 2021. Vol. 33, no, 24. Pp. 17245-17256.
Ahmed Sh., Khan Z.A., Mohsin S.M., Latif Sh., Aslam Sh., Mujlid H., Adil M., Najam Z. Effective and efficient DDoS attack detection using deep learning algorithm, multi-layer perceptron // Future Internet. 2023. Vol. 15, no. 2. Pp. 76-85.
Ahmed Sh. A software framework for predicting the maize yield using modified multi-layer perceptron // Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15, no. 4. P. 3017.
Murugesan R., Mishra E., Krishnan A.H. Forecasting agricultural commodities prices using deep learning-based models: basic LSTM, BI-LSTM, stacked LSTM, CNN LSTM, and convolutional LSTM // International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics. 2022. Vol. 8, no. 3. P. 242.
Murugesan R., Mishra E., Krishnan A.H.Forecasting agricultural commodities prices using deep learning-based models: basic LSTM, BI-LSTM, stacked LSTM, CNN LSTM, and convolutional LSTM // International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics. 2022. Vol. 8, no. 3. P. 242.
Bayram F., Aupke Ph., Ahmed B.S., Kassler A., Theocharis A., Forsman J. DA-LSTM: A dynamic drift-adaptive learning framework for interval load forecasting with LSTM networks // Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2023. Vol. 123. P. 106480.
Nurhidayat, Defit S., Sumijan. Data mining dalamakurasitingkatkelayakanpakaiterhadapperalatanperangkatKeras // Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi. 2020. Pp. 83-88.
Jaiswal G. Stock prediction model using TensorFlow // International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. 2021. Vol. 9, no. 12. Pp. 99-103.
Nunez-Yanez J., Otero A., de la Torre E.Dynamically reconfigurable variable-precision sparse-dense matrix acceleration in TensorFlow lite // Microprocessors and Microsystems. 2023. Vol. 98. P. 104801.
Zhu M., Min W., Li J., Liu M., Deng Z., Zhang Ya. Constructing a smoothed leaky relu using a linear combination of the smoothed ReLu and identity function // Neural Computing & Applications. 2025. Vol. 37, no. 9. Pp. 6465-6478.
Diederik P. Kingma, Jimmy Lei Ba. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization // Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2015. Pp. 1-15.
Koc I., Arslan E. Dynamic ticket pricing of airlines using variant batch size interpretable multi-variable long short-term memory // Expert Systems with Applications. 2021. Vol. 175. P. 114794.
Shalabh.Interactive web-based data visualization with R, Plotly, and Shiny // Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society). 2021. Vol. 184, no. 3. P. 1150
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Д С Пономарёв

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.