Formation of System of Indicators for the Evaluation of Design Solutions in High-Rise Housing Construction

Authors

  • L. S. Grebenshchikova Kalashnikov ISTU
  • N. M. Yakushev Kalashnikov ISTU
  • I. B. Ivanova Kalashnikov ISTU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22213/2413-1172-2017-3-62-66

Keywords:

evaluation of design solutions, expert survey, weighting factors, calculation of the integral indicator

Abstract

The paper describes the sequence of development and validation of methods for assessment of projects of apartment houses on the basis of the scorecard. A variety of proposals for those who are planning to improve their housing conditions greatly complicates the choice. Indeed, it is difficult to focus on one option when there are so many tempting alternatives. We have attempted to develop a methodology to assess design solutions based on a set of indicators and choose the best option from the point of view of the buyer, with the help of the expert survey. The selection of the expert group was held by way of mutual recommendations (“snowball”). The disadvantage of this method is the lack of assurance of estimation reliability. Group expert assessment can be considered objective only if there is the sufficient consistency in the responses of experts. We have chosen the method of the study - individual interview, which takes place in the form of a free conversation and allows you to receive from the respondent the detailed information on the issues discussed; it is held in the convenient for the expert time, and allows for eliminating the influence of authority and the suppression of other opinions. According to the results of the expert survey a structured model of assessment was composed in which characteristics of the project are located at four levels: 1) price and reliability of the developer; 2) description of the apartment; 3) description of the house; 4) feature of the construction area. Each characteristic of the project is described by several indicators. Based on the ranks of the experts, weighting coefficients (coefficients of importance) of each indicator were calculated. For testing the methodology two projects similar in space and layout design and location were taken. The list of indicators on the blocks, instructions for calculating, weighting factors and calculation of integrated indicators are presented in the tabular form.

Author Biographies

L. S. Grebenshchikova, Kalashnikov ISTU

Master’s Degree Student

N. M. Yakushev, Kalashnikov ISTU

PhD in Economics

I. B. Ivanova, Kalashnikov ISTU

PhD in Economics

References

Проекты многоквартирных домов [Электронный ресурс]. - URL: http://proekt-sam.ru/proektzdanii/proektymnogokvartirnyh-domov.html - Загл. с экрана.

СП 54.13330.2011 Здания жилые многоквартирные : актуализированная редакция СНиП 31-01-2003 [Электронный ресурс]. - URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/ 1200084096 - Загл. с экрана.

Грахов В. П., Кислякова Ю. Г., Калинина О. Ф. Исследование факторов, влияющих на развитие жилищно-строительного комплекса региона // Экономика и предпринимательство. - 2014. - № 4-2(45-2). - С. 946-948. - ISSN 1999-2300.

Экспертный опрос [Электронный ресурс]. - URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Экспертный_опрос - Загл. с экрана.

Литвак Б. Г. Экспертные оценки и принятие решений. - М. : Патент, 1996.

ООО «АСПЭК-Домстрой» [Электронный ресурс]. - URL: http://aspecdom.ru/projects/50#page - Загл. с экрана.

ООО «Урал-Домстрой» [Электронный ресурс]. - URL: http://www.uds18.ru/objects/ocean-city-section-1/- Загл. с экрана.

Published

06.10.2017

How to Cite

Grebenshchikova Л. С., Yakushev Н. М., & Ivanova И. Б. (2017). Formation of System of Indicators for the Evaluation of Design Solutions in High-Rise Housing Construction. Vestnik IzhGTU Imeni M.T. Kalashnikova, 20(3), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.22213/2413-1172-2017-3-62-66

Issue

Section

Economics (only archive)