The Paradigm of Continuous Education: Approaches to Essence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22213/2413-1172-2018-1-131-135Keywords:
continuous education, traditional education, pedagogical and educational paradigms, adaptation to the global economy, transdisciplinarityAbstract
The author, analyzing the phenomenon of “continuous education,” shares her thoughts on the fact that, perhaps, for studying and understanding the needs of an innovative society, it is necessary to supplement the pedagogical and educational paradigm with the paradigm of continuous education. For this paradigm it is characteristic that the learner plays the main role with his motivation for cognition, creating his own criteria aimed at constructing the future in the face of increasing uncertainty, which contributes to the formation of a stable basis in professional activity and preparation for changes in the life process and reflection. The paradigm of continuous education changes the emphasis from pragmatic knowledge to the development of a common culture, from the historical context of the formation of scientific knowledge to modern concepts of the structure and integral content of the system of sciences. It may be about the need to move to a completely new philosophical concept of lifelong education, the goal of which must be recognized not only the education of man, but also the ability to quickly adapt to a new global economy. In conditions of high social dynamics and continuous changes in social and professional structures, the task of continuing education is not simply the elimination of functional illiteracy of the population, but the solution of problems of technological illiteracy, that is, the use of new technologies as they arise, as well as the elimination of the trans-illiteracy, i.e., the problems with using information from different sources in everyday life. The problems of creating a paradigm for lifelong learning should be the object of further, multifaceted, systemic research of an integrative, interdisciplinary nature that has recently been increasingly described through the phenomenon of “transdisciplinarity.”References
Ильин Г. Л. Инновации в образовании. Москва : Прометей, 2015. 425 с.
Там же.
Богуславский М. В. Научно-педагогические парадигмы: история и современность / М. В. Богуславский, Г. Б. Корнетов // Современные проблемы истории образования и педагогической науки / под ред. З. И. Равкина. М. : ИТПиМИО РАО. Т. 1. М., 1994. C. 58-64.
Вербицкий А. А. От парадигмы обучения к парадигме образования // Гуманистические тенденции в развитии непрерывного образования взрослых в России и США. М., 1994. С. 15-26.
Ильин Г. Л. Указ. соч.
Ильясов И. И. Структура процесса учения. М. : МГУ, 1986. С. 68-74.
Андрейчук Н. В. Проблема непрерывного образования в контексте современной философии образования // Вестник РГУ им. И. Канта, 2007. С. 7-15.
Ильин Г. Л. Указ. соч.
Философские проблемы междисциплинарного синтеза / Д. И. Широканов [и др.] ; науч. ред. Д. И. Широканов. Минск : Беларуская навука, 2015. 363 с.
Киященко Л. П. Философия трансдисциплинарности: подходы к определению // Трансдисциплинарность в философии и науке: подходы, проблемы, перспективы. М. : Навигатор, 2015. 564 с.