A Comparative Performance Analysis of Relaying Data in FANET
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22213/2413-1172-2019-1-108-115Keywords:
UAV, FANET, relay, routing, mobility, NS-3Abstract
In this paper, we analyze Quality of Service metrics (QoS). We observe the situation with relaying streaming data in Flying Ad Hoc Networks (FANET). The efficiency was analyzed analytically and with using Network Simulator-3 (NS-3). All calculations are made for three scenarios. In the first scenario, the source node is removed from the destination node at a certain distance. In the second scenario, a flying relay node is added between the source node and the destination node, which runs one of the routing protocols; the source node is also removed from the destination node. In the third scenario, the relay node flies in a circle with a different radius, with the source node moving away from the destination node. In all scenarios, comparative results of simulation modeling and mathematical calculations are given. Free-Space Mode was chosen as a propagation model for simulation. In the first scenario, an analytical graph of the dependence of the average error rate during transmission on energy per bit is constructed. For all other scenarios, graphs of the dependence of the average packet delivery ratio on the distance were plotted.References
Летающие сенсорные сети / А. Е. Кучерявый [и др.] // Электросвязь. 2014. № 9. С. 2-5.
Кучерявый А. Е., Прокопьев А. В., Кучерявый Е. А. Самоорганизующиеся сети. СПб. : Любавич, 2011. 310 с.
BekmezciI., SahingozO.K., Temel Ş. Flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): A survey. Ad Hoc Networks, 2013, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1254-1270.
Sahingoz O.K. Networking models in flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): Concepts and challenges. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2014, vol. 74, no. 1-2, pp. 513-527.
Кайсина И. А., Васильев Д. С., Абилов А. В. Анализ эффективности протоколов маршрутизации OLSR и AODV в летающей сети FANET // Вестник ИжГТУ имени М. Т. Калашникова. 2017. Т. 20, №. 1. С. 87-90.
Vasiliev D.S., Meitis D.S., Abilov A. Simulation-based comparison of AODV, OLSR and HWMP protocols for flying Ad Hoc networks. International Conference on Next Generation Wired/Wireless Networking, Springer, Cham, 2014, pp. 245-252.
Леонов А. В., Литвинов Г. А. Применение алгоритма пчелиной колонии BeeAdHoc для маршрутизации в FANET // Вестник СибГУТИ. 2018. №. 1. С. 85-95.
Ibrahim I.N. Desiging a Real Mathematical Model of a Hexacopter in the Inertial Frame // Вестник ИжГТУ имени М. Т. Калашникова. 2017. T. 20, №. 1. С. 91-94.
Ibrahim I.N., Akkad M.A.A., Abramov I.V. UAV efficient PID and LQR controllers design based on its stochastic state space dynamics model including disturbances. Electronic and Networking Technologies (MWENT). Moscow, Workshop on. IEEE, 2018, pp. 1-9.
Henderson T.R. Network simulations with the ns-3 simulator. SIGCOMM demonstration, 2008, vol. 14, no. 14, p. 527.
Riley G.F., Henderson T.R. The ns-3 network simulator. Modeling and tools for network simulation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 15-34.
Henderson T.R. The ns-3 project goals. Proc. 2006 workshop on ns-2: the IP network simulator. ACM, 2006, p. 13.
Кайсина И. А., Васильев Д. С., Абилов А. В. Модель в среде ns-3 для передачи видеоданных в сети БПЛА // Материалы XXIII Республ. выставки-сессии студенческих инновационных проектов. Изд-во ИжГТУ имени М. Т. Калашникова, 2017. С. 69-74.
Khosroshahy M. Study and implementation of IEEE 802.11 physical channel model in yans (ns3 prototype) network simulator. INRIA Report, 2006, pp. 1-61.
Kurniawan A. Selective Route Based on SNR with Cross-Layer Scheme in Wireless Ad Hoc Network. Journal of Computer Networks and Communications, 2017, vol. 2017.
Там же.
Prabhu R.S., Daneshrad B. An energy-efficient water-filling algorithm for OFDM systems. Communications (ICC), 2010 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2010, pp. 1-5.
Atya A.O.F. Wireless network coding: Deciding when to flip the switch. INFOCOM, Proc. IEEE, 2013, pp. 260-264.
