Experience of Using the Program “Universal Mechanism” for Calculating the Automation of Small Arms and Assessing the Prospects for Its Use

Authors

  • D. V. Chirkov Kalashnikov ISTU
  • M. A. Sementsov Kalashnikov ISTU
  • A. B. Pryakhin Kalashnikov ISTU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22213/2413-1172-2022-1-27-37

Keywords:

small arms, dynamics calculation, calculation of automation

Abstract

An important step of designing automatic and semi-automatic small arms is to carry out estimated calculations of the operating ability of automation, implying determining the velocity of the bolt or the bolt carrier in the automatic work cycle. Classical methods for calculating the weapon automation are based on reduction mechanisms to some equivalent mechanism with one moving link and a reduced resistance force acting on it. This method is universal, but labor-consuming and difficult to formalize, which is associated with a wide variety of structural design of mechanisms. In addition, the assumptions used when reducing real mechanisms to equivalent ones, decrease the accuracy of calculations. Taking into account the fact that in modern conditions the stage of technical project ends with the creation of an electronic three-dimensional model of the product, it becomes possible to carry out kinematic and dynamic analysis of weapon automation using modern software systems. This should make it possible to decrease the complexity of calculations significantly while increasing their accuracy. This article describes the experience of using the program of kinematic and dynamic analysis “Universal Mechanism” for calculation of a semi-automatic traumatic pistol automation. A comparison of the results of calculating automation, performed on the basis of classical methods and by the program “Universal Mechanism”, is presented; the difference in the results in key points less than 5 %. As a result of the work carried out, the main advantages of the “Universal Mechanism” software package were revealed: the ability to calculate complex spatial interactions that were not previously taken into account by classical methods (feeding, reflection of the sleeve), the visibility of the process (the presence of animation) and the ability to create program modules independently. The main disadvantages include the laboriousness of introducing contact interactions (and impacts) and assigning the parameters of these interactions. As a result of the work carried out, it is concluded that the “Universal Mechanism” software complex is suitable for carrying out a kinematic and dynamic analysis of small arms automation mechanisms and there is a possibility of creating on its basis a modern computational and design complex adapted for the development of small arms.

Author Biographies

D. V. Chirkov, Kalashnikov ISTU

DSc in Engineering

M. A. Sementsov, Kalashnikov ISTU

A. B. Pryakhin, Kalashnikov ISTU

References

Галаган Л. А., Чирков Д. В., Сахратов Р. Ю. Автоматы Калашникова. Функционально-морфологический анализ : монография. Ижевск : Изд-во ИжГТУ имени М. Т. Калашникова, 2018. 160 с. (Гордость моя Удмуртия).

Попугаев М. Г. Моделирование пространственного трехзвенного поворотного механизма в программе T-Flex // Автоматизированное проектирование в машиностроении. 2015. №. 3. С. 69-72.

Стрыгин С. В., Наседкин К. В. Проверка решения задачи синтеза кулачкового механизма средствами программного комплекса T-Flex // Новые технологии в учебном процессе и производстве. 2016. С. 336-341.

Алямовский А. SolidWorks Simulation. Инженерный анализ для профессионалов: задачи, методы, рекомендации. М. : Пресс, 2015. 562 с.

Cheng Y. Investigation on anti-penetration performance of reinforced concrete targets based on ANSYS/LS-DYNA. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, vol. 677, no. 2, p. 022064.

Kumar M.S. Rotor dynamic analysis using ANSYS. IUTAM Symposium on Emerging Trends in Rotor Dynamics, Springer, 2011, pp. 153-162.

Кройтор О. К. Моделирование пробивания плоских преград в Ansys Autodyn // Аллея науки. 2017. Т. 2, № 10. С. 241-245.

Vavro jr J. Kinematic and dynamic analysis and distribution of stress in items of planar mechanisms by means of the MSC ADAMS software. Manufacturing technology, 2017, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 267-270.

Zafar A., Umida N., Shakhnoza K. Modeling dynamic operation of mechanisms in Autodesk Inventor Professional 1.International Conference on Information Science and Communications Technologies (ICISCT), IEEE, 2019.

Dmitry Pogorelov, Alexander Rodikov, Roman Kovalev. Parallel computations and co-simulation in Universal Mechanism software. Part I: Algorithms and implementation. Transport problems, 2019, vol. 14, no. 3. DOI: 10.20858/tp.2019.14.3.15.

Dmitry Pogorelov, Alexander Rodikov, Roman Kovalev. Parallel computations and co-simulation in Universal Mechanism software. Transport problems, 2019, vol. 14, no. 4. DOI: 10.20858/tp.2019.14.4.3.

Бойков В. Г. Моделирование движения автомобиля в программном комплексе EULER и сравнение расчетов с натурными испытаниями. Мобильные роботы и мехатронные системы : материалы с Всероссийского научно-технического фестиваля молодежи имени профессора Е. А. Девянина «Мобильные роботы 2005». М., 2005. С. 129-137.

Моделирование контактных взаимодействий в задачах динамики систем тел. Динамика, прочность и надежность транспортных машин / Д. Ю. Погорелов, А. Э. Павлюков, Т. А. Юдакова, С. В. Котов ; под ред. В. И. Сакало. Брянск : БГТУ, 2001. С. 11-23.

Чирков Д. В., Федорова Е. А. Студенческое оружейное конструкторское бюро предприятия как форма интеграции в системе «Наука - Образование - Производство» // Военная безопасность России: взгляд в будущее : материалы 6-й Международной межведомственной научно-практической конференции научного отделения № 10 Российской академии ракетных и артиллерийских наук (Москва, 18 марта 2021 г.). М. : Изд-во МГТУ имени Н. Э. Баумана, 2021. С. 401-404.

Галаган Л. А. Методы учета силы сопротивления гильзы при извлечении из патронника // Вестник ИжГТУ. 2012. № 2 (54). С. 29-32.

Published

02.06.2022

How to Cite

Chirkov Д. В., Sementsov М. А., & Pryakhin А. Б. (2022). Experience of Using the Program “Universal Mechanism” for Calculating the Automation of Small Arms and Assessing the Prospects for Its Use. Vestnik IzhGTU Imeni M.T. Kalashnikova, 25(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.22213/2413-1172-2022-1-27-37

Issue

Section

Articles