Transmission quality evaluation of multistreaming video data from the UAV to the ground station in network simulator 3 simulation environment using WI-FI standards

Authors

  • R. E. Shibanov Kalashnokov ISTU
  • I. A. Kaysina Kalashnokov ISTU
  • A. V. Abilov The Bonch-Bruevich Saint Petersburg State University of Telecommunications
  • K. E. Korepanov Kalashnikov ISTU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22213/2413-1172-2023-1-91-99

Keywords:

Goodput, PDR, Wi-Fi, NS-3, multistreaming, uav

Abstract

The article presents the results of transmitting video data simulation in real time from video cameras on board Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to a ground station (GS). The main purpose of the article was to evaluate the impact of the flying source node number on Quality of Service (QoS) metrics, such as Packet Delivery Ratio and Goodput at OSI model application layer. A scenario was considered when hovering over UAVs, in the zone of reliable communication, transmitted a stream of video data to a ground station, then the distance between the UAV and the GS increased to repeat the experiment. The bitrate was maintained at the same level, close to the bitrate of real high-definition video. The experiment was carried out in the Network Simulator 3 (NS-3) simulation environment for scenarios with one, two, four, and eight source nodes. Simulation results have shown the negative impact of the increasing the number of flying source nodes on Quality of Service (QoS) metrics such as Packet Delivery Rate (PDR) and Goodput. Recommendations regarding the applicability of different standards of the 802.11 family to scenarios for using UAVs in the multistreaming video data transmission mode are given. A change in the relationship of useful throughput on the number of source nodes by 15 % was also found.

Author Biographies

R. E. Shibanov, Kalashnokov ISTU

Student

I. A. Kaysina, Kalashnokov ISTU

PhD in Engineering

A. V. Abilov, The Bonch-Bruevich Saint Petersburg State University of Telecommunications

PhD in Engineering, Associate Professor

K. E. Korepanov, Kalashnikov ISTU

Master’s Degree Student

References

Saliba D. (2019) Planning and Profit Sharing in Overlay WiFi and LTE Systems toward 5G Networks. J. of Software Engineering and Applications, 2019, vol. 12, pp. 491-508.

Chen Y. C., Towsley D., Khalili R. (2016) MSPlayer: Multi-source and multi-path video streaming. IEEE J. on Selected Areas in Communications, 2016, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 2198-2206.

Shvyrev B. A., Timonov D. A. (2019) Acoustic information leakage channel by means of visible light modulation // Вестник УрФО. 2019. Т. 31, № 1. С. 11-16.

Глушаков В. Е. Исследование различных моделей передачи данных двумя станциями в сети Wi-Fi // Международный научно-исследовательский журнал. 2021. № 9-1 (111). С. 17-24.

Masiukiewicz A. (2019) Throughput comparison between the new HEW 802.11 ax standard and 802.11 n/ac standards in selected distance windows.International J. of Electronics and Telecommunications, 2019,vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 79-84.

Khan G. Z. (2016) On the Field Level Loss of a VHT PPDU in a MIMO-OFDM System for a WiFi Direct 802.11 ac WLAN.2016 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT). IEEE, 2016, pp. 164-169.

Karmakar R., Chattopadhyay S., Chakraborty S. (2017) Impact of IEEE 802.11 n/ac PHY/MAC high throughput enhancements on transport and application protocols. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2017, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2050-2091.

Sun X. (2019) Physical layer security in UAV systems: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2019, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 40-47.

Li B. (2019) Physical-layer security in space information networks. IEEE Internet of Things J., 2019, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 33-52.

Фокин Г. А., Владыко А. Г. Позиционирование транспортных средств с комплексированием дальномерных, угломерных и инерциальных измерений в расширенном фильтре Калмана // Труды учебных заведений связи. 2021. № 7 (2). С. 51-67.

Borges D. (2019) Low Complexity Millimeter Wave Point-to-point Communication: Interference Assessment of BPSK vs QPSK Decomposition. 2019 PhotonIcs & Electromagnetics Research Symposium-Spring (PIERS-Spring). IEEE, 2019, pp. 2376-2384.

Sharoar Jahan Choyon A. K. M., Chowdhury R. (2020) Performance comparison of free-space optical (FSO) communication link under OOK, BPSK, DPSK, QPSK and 8-PSK modulation formats in the presence of strong atmospheric turbulence. J. of Optical Communications, 2020.

Репин Д. С., Филаретов Г. Ф., Червова А. А. Исследование фрактальных характеристик сетевого трафика // Информатизация образования и науки. 2019. № 2. С. 48-67.

Кутузов О. И., Татарникова Т. М. Метод ускоренного имитационного моделирования сетевых узлов коммутации // Известия высших учебных заведений. Приборостроение. 2019. Т. 62, № 1. С. 23-31.

Rochim A. F. (2020) Performance Comparison of Wireless Protocol IEEE 802.11 ax vs 802.11 ac. 2020 International Conference on Smart Technology and Applications (ICoSTA). IEEE, 2020, pp. 1-5.

Ravindranath N. S. (2016) Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.11 ac and 802.11 n using NS3. Indian J. of Science and Technology, 2016, vol. 9, no. 26, pp. 1-9.

Masiukiewicz A. (2019) Throughput comparis on between the new HEW 802.11 ax standard and 802.11 n/ac standards in selected distance windows.International J. of Electronics and Telecommunications, 2019, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 79-84.

Обзор методов улучшения доставки потоковых данных в беспроводных самоорганизующихся сетях / В. В. Титов [и др.] // Приборостроение в XXI веке - 2020. Интеграция науки, образования и производства: материалы конференции. Изд-во УИР ИжГТУ имени М. Т. Калашникова, 2020. С. 226-233.

Campanile L. (2020) Computer network simulation with ns-3: A systematic literature review. Electronics, 2020, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 272.

Кайсина И. А. Моделирование полезной пропускной способности сети БПЛА при мультипотоковой передаче // Труды учебных заведений связи. 2020. Т. 6, № 1. С. 100-108.

Published

08.04.2023

How to Cite

Shibanov Р. Э., Kaysina И. А., Abilov А. В., & Korepanov К. Э. (2023). Transmission quality evaluation of multistreaming video data from the UAV to the ground station in network simulator 3 simulation environment using WI-FI standards. Vestnik IzhGTU Imeni M.T. Kalashnikova, 26(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.22213/2413-1172-2023-1-91-99

Issue

Section

Articles