NATURE OF SENSITIVITY AND ITS ROLE IN EDUCATIONAL PROCESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22213/2618-9763-2023-3-83-91Keywords:
learning ability, educability, Sensitivity characteristics, sensitivity network, sensory sensitivity, mental sensitivityAbstract
The article is devoted to the research of the nature of mental sensitiveness, which means the characteristic feature of man, inherent to him and conditioned by the work of his psyche. In this respect mental sensitivity is contrasted with sensory sensitivity, i.e. the psychological aspect of personality comes into conflict with the physiological one. However, this understanding is wrong. If we talk about the formation and development of a person, it is necessary to consider mental and sensory sensitivity as interrelated. The only criterion that can distinguish between mental and sensory types of sensitivity is the measurement criterion. The article pays special attention to the role that sensitivity is able to play in the educational capabilities of an individual. Such criteria as creativity, that is, ability to creativity, and learning, that is, ability to learn, are considered. The following characteristics of sensitivity are distinguished: gradation, measurability and immeasurability, innateness and genetic conditionality, immediacy, developability, dependence on society, staging, spontaneity and regularity, positive and negative impact. The study concluded that both high and low sensitivity can influence the educational process both positively and negatively. It all depends on the extent to which a person is able to recognize and manage own sensitive dependency. It was concluded that all kinds of sensitivity are combined into a network that can be adjusted: if one of its parameters changes, it can also lead to network changes. In addition, there is a direct correlation between the level of sensibility and the creative abilities of an individual: the higher are the mental and sensory sensitivity, the greater is the creativity.References
Korchak Yа. Kak lyubit' rebenka [How to love a child]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2019, 576 p.
Martindale C., Anderson K., Moore K., West A. N. Creativity, oversensitivity, and rate of habituation. Personality and Individual Differences, 1996, vol. 20, issue 4, рр. 423-427.
Kalashnikova M.B. [Development of L.S. Vygotsky's ideas on the sensitive periods of ontogenesis in modern domestic and foreign psychology]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya, 2007, vol. 3, no. 3, рр. 33-41. (in Russ.).
Anan'ev B.G. Izbrannye psihologicheskie trudy. V 2 t. T. I. [Selected psychological works. In 2 vols. Vol. I]. Moscow, Pedagogy Publ., 1980, 230 p. (in Russ.).
Vygotskij L.S. Psihologiya razvitiya cheloveka [Psychology of human development]. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 2005, 1136 p. (in Russ.).
Vygotskij L.S. Myshlenie i rech' [Thinking and speech]. Moscow, Labyrinth Publ., 1999. 352 p. (in Russ.).
Erikson E.H. Growth and Crises of the "Healthy Personality". Symposium on the Healthy Personality. M J.E. Senn, editor. New York, Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, 1950, pp. 91-146.
Erikson E.H. Childhood and Society. New York, W.W. Norton & Company, 1963, 448 p.
Shtyk K.S. [Irreversibility of the sensational period: mowgli children]. Mirovaya nauka, 2019, no. 5 (26), рр. 745-747. (in Russ.).
Kosheleva E.S. [Aesthetic sensitivity is the dominant in modeling the process of development of creative abilities in children 2-5 years old]. Vestnik Baltijskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta, 2015, no. 5, рр. 134-141. (in Russ.).
Blueprint. Reviewed by Jeffrey M. Craig. Australia Twin Research and Human Genetics, 2019, no. 22, pp. 75-77.
Plomin R. Blueprint: How DNA Makes Us Who We Are. Allen Lane, 2018, р. 288.
Sabadosh P.A. Razrabotka metodov diagnostiki jesteticheskih sposobnostej: testy jesteticheskoj chuvstvitel'nosti [Development of methods for diagnosing aesthetic abilities: tests of aesthetic sensitivity]. Sovremennye issledovaniya intellekta i tvorchestva]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015, pp. 250-262. (in Russ.).
Myagkov A.Yu. [Statistical strategies of sensational measurements]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 2002, no. 1, рр. 111-121. (in Russ.).
Nekipelova I. M., Nekipelov E. Sh. [Human capital of personality: vital, hard, soft, mental and meta skills]. Social'no-jekonomicheskoe upravlenie: teorija I praktika, 2021, 18, no.1, pp. 60-75. (in Russ.). EDN: RGMUPI. DOI: 10.24412/2470-1262-2022-1-41-51
Kodzhaspirova G.M., Kodzhaspirov A.YU. Pedagogicheskij slovar' [Pedagogical dictionary]. Moscow, Academy Publ., 2003, 176 р. (in Russ.).
Burmistrova M.N., Vasil'eva L.L., Kashcheeva A.V., Kirilenko N.P., PetrovaL.Yu., Chernyaeva T.N. Social'no-pedagogicheski jslovar' [Social and pedagogical dictionary]. Saratov, Saratov State University, 2016, 126 p. (in Russ.).
Pushkareva T.V. [The problem of interiorization of knowledge in psychological and pedagogical science]. Sovremennye problem nauki i obrazovaniya, 2015, no. 1-1, рр. 35-45. (in Russ.).
Nekipelova I.M. Processy jazykovoj interiorizacii i jeksteriorizacii v osushhestvlenii mezhkul'turnoj kommunikacii v prostranstve polikul'turnogo sociuma [Processes of language interiorization and exteriorization in the implementation of intercultural communication in the space of a multicultural society]. Sovremennye trendy v mezhkul'turnoj kommunikacii i didaktike: monografija, Warsaw, Varshavskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, 2022, рр. 396-421. (in Russ.).
Nekipelova I. M., Minasyan S.M. [Problems of atypical interiorization of multi-valued omonyms of the non-native language (based on the relation of the word "предложение" to its corresponding words in English and Yoruba)]. Cuadernos de Rusística Española, 2021, no. 17, pp. 117-133. (in Russ.). EDN: JOXNHB, DOI: 10.30827/cre.v17.21054
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 И М Некипелова, Э Ш Некипелов
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.