On the study of terminological agnonymy (based on the material of corpora and dictionaries)

Authors

  • J. V. Zhigliy Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs
  • S. D. Zlivko Kalashnikov Izhevsk State Technical University
  • S. A. Lipovaya Kazan Trade and Economic College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22213/2618-9763-2025-3-87-91

Keywords:

orthology, corpus, lexicographic tradition, agnonym

Abstract

This scientific study focuses on the peculiarities of representing agonyms (in orthological dictionaries and corpora) to address the challenges of enhancing the speech culture of Russian language speakers. Attention is drawn to the possibilities of using different types of dictionaries, various types of dictionaries and materials from the Russian National Corpus to foster the speech culture of linguists (students, master's students, doctoral candidates and young researchers). The authors believe that a dictionary reflects the stability of the language system (normative aspect), while a corpus provides insight into the evolutionary processes within the language and its “living” facts. Therefore, a corpus can be regarded as a new tool for scientific linguistic analysis. Modern corpora are supplemented with frequency and distributional dictionaries, with particular attention given to the capabilities of frequency dictionaries for studying rarely encountered words in the text, which may claim the status of agnonyms, as well as the issue of “non-dictionary words”. It is proposed to use a distribution dictionary to determine semantic relations of words (phraseologisms, concepts). The national corpus of the Russian language is balanced, includes texts of various stylistic (genre) affiliation, which allows studying agnonymy in various functional strata of the Russian language (book, poetic, scientific, argot, jargon vocabulary and phraseology), as well as taking into account the evolutionary processes in the language system (deactualization, re-deactualization, communicative drift, etc.). Attention is focused on the fact that the corpus and dictionaries allow studying new things in the national language (neology, neography), occasional, idiolect features of speech, and also facilitate the construction of “agnonymy zones” for a specific user. The article discusses the features of preparing the necessary information about agnonym terms in a dictionary or corpus, taking into account such criteria of the definitional part as scientific value, sufficiency, etc.

Author Biographies

J. V. Zhigliy, Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs

Candidate of Philological Science

S. D. Zlivko, Kalashnikov Izhevsk State Technical University

Candidate of Philological Science

S. A. Lipovaya, Kazan Trade and Economic College

teacher

References

Портал «Манускрипт: Славянское письменное наследие». URL: http://manuscripts.ru/mns/mns_evp.vec.simple (дата обращения: 07.012.2024 г.).

Новое в русской лексике. Словарные материалы. Санкт-Петербург: Институт лингвистических исследований РАН. URL: https://neolex.iling.spb.ru/glossary. (дата обращения: 07.12.2024).

Морковкин В. В. Типология лексических значений как объект словарной лексикологии // Русистика сегодня. 1998. № 3-4. С. 3-9. EDN: WZMCYM

Морковкин В. В., Морковкина А. В. Русские агнонимы (слова, которые мы не знаем). Москва : Астрель, 1997. 414 с.

Морковкин В. В., Кочнева Е. М. Ориентация на пользователя как доминанта учебной лексикографии // EURALEX's Proceedings I-П / eds.: Н. Tommola, К. Varantola, Т. Salmi-Tolonen, J. Schoop. Tampere, 1992. Pp. 81-87.

Морковкин В. В. Антропоцентрический versus лингвоцентрический подход к лексикографированию // Национальная специфика языка и ее отражение в нормативном словаре : сб. ст. Москва : Наука, 1988. С. 131-136. EDN: WQSIBW

Щур Е. А. Источники формирования русской эрратографии // Russian Linguistic Bulletin. 2023. № 12 (48). DOI: 10.18454/RULB.2023.48.27

Национальный корпус русского языка. URL: https://ruscorpora.ru/page/corpora-quote/(для авторизованных пользователей).

Уфимцева А. А. Типы словесных знаков : монография. Москва : Едиториал УРСС, 2004. 208 с. C. 53 (Лингвистическое наследие XX века).

Караулов Ю. Н., Красильникова Е. В. Русская языковая личность и задачи ее изучения // Язык и личность / отв. ред. Д. Н. Шмелев. Москва: Наука, 1989. С. 3-10. EDN: SAPSKN

Бубнова И. А. Эволюция русской языковой личности // Вестник МГПУ. Серия: Филология. Теория языка. Языковое образование. 2015. № 3 (19). С. 34-41.

Мандрикова Г. М. Основные положения антропоцентрической лексикографии // Мир науки, культуры, образования. 2011. № 2 (27). С. 8-12.

Published

06.10.2025

How to Cite

Zhigliy Ю. В., Zlivko С. Д., & Lipovaya С. А. (2025). On the study of terminological agnonymy (based on the material of corpora and dictionaries). Social’no-Ekonomiceskoe Upravlenie: Teoria I Praktika, 21(3), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.22213/2618-9763-2025-3-87-91

Issue

Section

Articles