Literary diplomacy as a phenomenon of Russian political discourse - on the case of V.V. Putin's speeches

Authors

  • P. A. Katyshev Pushkin State Russian Language Institute
  • S. Jing Pushkin State Russian Language Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22213/2618-9763-2026-1-103-109

Keywords:

literary diplomacy, citation, interpretation, recontextualization, political discourse, V.V. Putin’s speeches

Abstract

The article examines the phenomenon of literary diplomacy in the context of contemporary Russian political discourse. Particular attention is given to the analysis of the use of literary sources in the public speeches of the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin as a tool for implementing communicative strategies and achieving pragmatic effects. The idea is substantiated that purposeful reference to fiction contributes to enhancing the persuasiveness of statements, fostering an atmosphere of trust and friendliness, as well as constructing a positive image of the leader in the perception of both domestic and international audiences. The study considers three main ways of incorporating literary sources into the politician’s speeches: direct quotation, interpretation, and recontextualization. The article is also devoted to a comprehensive quantitative and qualitative investigation of the frequency, genre affiliation of the borrowed works, and the thematic specifics of the contexts in which they are applied. The establishment of the frequency of use of literary elements in political speeches, the genre characteristics of the borrowed resources, and the content specifics of the contexts incorporating them demonstrates that from 2012 to 2023, in 466 speeches, the Russian leader referred to literary resources 118 times; preferences were given to allusions to novels, novellas, short stories, and tales (66% of all cases of literary resource use) and to the adaptive mechanism of recontextualization (47.5% of the total mentions of all adaptive mechanisms in the established text corpus). Notably, literary elements are more frequently used in the context of discussing issues of human well-being (28.81%) and diplomatic interactions (15.27%). The obtained data indicate the advisability of further research into the pragmatic mechanisms of using literary sources in political discourse, in particular on the basis of expanded text corpora, with the application of quantitative analysis methods and consideration of the dynamics of communicative situations across different periods.

Author Biographies

P. A. Katyshev, Pushkin State Russian Language Institute

Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor

S. Jing, Pushkin State Russian Language Institute

Post-graduate

References

Ян Ц. Инструменты и механизмы реализации китайской культурной дипломатии в отношении Российский Федерации // Международные отношения. 2023. № 1. С. 1-7. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0641.2023.1.40069. EDN: CCTWZM

Вотинцева К. А. Культурная дипломатия Китая // Гуманитарные научные исследования. 2014. № 11 (39). С. 112-115.

Костикова О. И. Литературный перевод как средство культурной дипломатии // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 22. Теория перевода. 2018. № 4. С. 168-171. EDN: YYTSIH

Hampton T. Fictions of Embassy: Literature and Diplomacy in Early Modern Europe. Cornell University Press, 2011. 256 с. DOI: 10.7591/j.ctt7zf1s

Hampton T. Literary Diplomacy: the Margins of Representation. Diplomatica. 2019. № 1. С. 26-32. DOI: 10.1163/25891774-00101005

Kristmannsson G. Literary Diplomacy: The Role of Translation in the Construction of National Literatures in Britain And Germany 1750-1830.Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, 2005. 504 с.

Qi L. Literature and art as political discourse: adapting The White-Haired Girl in the communist context of China // The Translator. 2024. Vol. 30, Issue 4: Political Discourse Translation in Contemporary Chinese and Western Contexts. Pp. 518-533. DOI: 10.1080/13556509.2024.2350782

Rancière J. Mute Speech: Literature, Critical Theory, and Politics. Columbia University Press, 2011. 208 s.

Nassa H. Literature in Law and Political Speech. Indian J.L. & Legal Rsch. 2022. № 4.

Семиотико-семасиологическое измерение политического дискурса : коллективная монография. Науч. ред.: Н. А. Боженкова, П. А. Катышев. Москва : Государственный институт русского языка им. А. С. Пушкина, 2021. С. 209. ISBN 978-5-98269-248-1. EDN: LZIXDM

van Dijk T. A. Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis // Discourse & Society. 1993. Vol. 4, no. 2. Pp. 249-283. DOI: 10.1177/0957926593004002006

Фуко М. Археология знания / пер. с фр. М. Кастальской. Санкт-Петербург : Гуманитарная академия, 2002. 416 с.

Fairclough N. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London : Longman, 1995. 265 с. DOI: 10.4324/9781315834368

Per L. Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualizations and the blending of voices in Professional discourse // Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 1998. С. 143-157. DOI: 10.1515/text.1.1998.18.2.143

Иванов П. К., Катышев П. А. Идеологема в политической коммуникации: Интерперсональный аспект // Виртуальная коммуникация и социальные сети. 2023. Т. 2. № 3 (7). С. 138-143. EDN: LFHZMK

Goffman E. Frame Analysis. Cambridge. Harvard University Press, 1974. S. 147. DOI: 10.4135/9781446278963.n6

Bernstein B. Class, Codes, and Control. Vol. 4. The structuring of pedagogic discourse. Moscow ; London : Routledge, 1990. 312 s. DOI: 10.4324/9780203011263

Геращенко В. П. Белый клобук и шапка Мономаха (к вопросу семиотики традиционного костюма Древней Руси) // Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета культуры и искусств. 2008. С. 44. EDN: MVHNTR

Хархордин О. В. Основные понятия российской политики. Москва : Новое литературное обозрение, 2011. 331 с. ISBN 978-5-86793-886-4

Wortman R. Scenarios of Power: Myth and Ceremony in Russian Monarchy. Vol. 1. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1995. 512 s.

Ключевский В. О. Курс русской истории : соч. в 9 т. Ч. 2. Москва : Мысль, 1987. 941 с.

van Dijk T. A. Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis // Discourse & Society. 1993. Vol. 4, no. 2. pp. 249-283. DOI: 10.1177/0957926593004002006

van Dijk T. A. Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis // Discourse & Society. 1993. Vol. 4, no. 2. pp. 249-283. DOI: 10.1177/0957926593004002006

Published

04.04.2026

How to Cite

Katyshev П. А., & Jing Ш. . (2026). Literary diplomacy as a phenomenon of Russian political discourse - on the case of V.V. Putin’s speeches. Social’no-Ekonomiceskoe Upravlenie: Teoria I Praktika, 22(1), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.22213/2618-9763-2026-1-103-109

Issue

Section

Articles